🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.