🔗 Share this article

The Four Spent the Day Together centers on characters seeking fresh starts, trying to break free from addictions or toxic relationships, only to witness hope devolve into violence. The author repeatedly invokes the phrase "new beginning", rendering it deliberately jaded through recurring use. Phrases such as "He was ready for a new beginning" and "They decided to make a fresh start" recur in the story. At the same time, she seems to be making her own fresh start, since this appears a new kind of book – documentarian, authentically narrative. But then it reveals itself to be filled with the recurring issues and approaches as her previous works.

From Chance Novelist to Iconic Work

Kraus began as an artist who entered the literary world almost accidentally with her 1997 seminal work I Love Dick, structured as epistles to an unresponsive love interest, converting confessional female writing from abjection into defiance. She continued writing, but the next trio of fascinating and rebarbative novels did not possess the impact and rawness that the correspondence format imparted to the tone of I Love Dick. This was not aided by was her identity as a maverick maker who had become a extensive real estate holder, so there was considerable focus on housing investments. It is logical that she currently desires to experiment with fresh narrative sources, directing her gaze to the experiences of others, at a time when she asserts that contemporary political climate turns intimate literature obsolete.

Several Eras, Shared Inescapable History

The Four Spent the Day Together is divided into three sections, encompassing several time periods – none able to break free from their histories. The book includes the story of a couple named Emma and Jasper, versions of the author's parents, relocating from the New York borough to a pastoral setting. Then there is the account of Kraus, in the persona of a figure named Catt Greene, reckoning with the delayed acclaim of I Love Dick, the emergence of Trump, and her partner struggling with addiction her husband Paul. And there is the account of a killing of one directionless individual by another in a locality largely deserted by progressive politics only a brief drive from Catt's rural residence in the Minnesota countryside.

As a reader attracted to polished prose of the sort Kraus tends to eschew, I was enchanted by the narrative style of the opening part.

As someone who reads who appreciates honed writing of the kind that the author often disregards, I was won over by the literary tone of the initial part. It exhibits a novel degree of detail that allows space for minutiae, like the container that the youthful Catt pries out of frozen water at the beginning of the narrative, helped by her cherished parent. "I found an ice toy!" she exclaims; "a great plaything", he replies, "the nuanced interpretations of terms tumbling in their mouths like sweet treats". She tells Emma's story with curiosity and intimacy. "It seemed to Emma she had entered a dream – not precisely her dream."

Disappointment and Disjunction

I was bound to become frustrated when I wished this fresh tone could last out the book. Kraus says here that she is annoyed by the enjoyment readers like me have derived from I Love Dick; she's dedicated to disjunction, to the unpolished style she shares with her idol Kathy Acker, and the emptiness and redundancy of her previous novels reasserts itself in the middle section. The protagonist is working on refurbishing three dozen dilapidated units in the city's most challenging districts while shuttling between two different states, unable to aid Paul curb his addiction. She is overwhelmed as Paul moves between underfunded jobs as an addiction therapist in a environment propelled by the anger and fear that powers a political win. A significant portion discusses about the protagonist facing cancellation on Twitter, her listed profession modified from "writer" to "real estate holder" on Wikipedia. She still gives the impression to care a little too much about this. On one occasion she states that she's researching the homicide so that before leaving Minnesota, "she might be able to learn something about an America that her social media opponents would be unable to grasp, would not even see".

The Killing Story

Then we reach to the actual killing – and the titular day experienced by the victim with the killer and his friends. Kraus has compelling foundational content, and reconstructs step by step what transpired when a man named Brandon came to see Brittney after connecting via an application where she sold sex pictures. He was hoping for sex but seems affably to have spent the day alongside her friends, wandering about fixing his automobile and funding treats and narcotics, before being murdered by Brittney's partner Micah – a young, mentally ill man who has often been institutionalized for violent rage.

Preoccupation and Open Ends

Catt gets obsessed by the account, and I was fascinated by the way that Kraus's dual urges towards responsible documentation and daring boundary-pushing tussle in this section. But I'd have liked her to delve deeper into her own obsessions here. The most interesting character is Brittney herself, who gains dimension partly through the protagonist's connection to her – another bright, bullied girl derailing in a difficult, overlooked locality. Kraus notes that Catt speaks to Brittney in jail, but she doesn't dramatise these conversations. The whole section feels oddly unfinished, to the point that the author's storytelling ends almost mid-par